DISTRICT HOME  |  CONTACT US  |  DIRECTIONS  |  SEARCH OUR SITE  |  FORT PLAIN A–Z  |  BACK

Fort Plain Central School District heading graphic photo of district awards and trophies vertical rule
 

 

top shadow edge graphic top shadow edge graphic top shadow edge graphic

Douglas C. Burton

Superintendent of Schools

25 High Street

Fort Plain, NY 13339

518.993.4000

 

 
 

District

New York State Property Tax Cap Now Official 

Its official: New York State has a property tax cap.

Adopted by the Legislature at the end of June, the measure seeks to limit the annual increase in the tax levies of local governments and school districts.

While the new law is being advertised as a 2 percent cap, districts actual increases are likely to vary from that figure due to several provisions of the new law, including certain costs that are exempt from the cap and the fact that voter approval will still be required for budget passage.

So, what does a tax cap mean for our schools?

Fort Plain Central School District Superintendent Douglas C. Burton said the tax cap will create a significant new challenge for Boards of Education in developing budgets, as they seek to stay within the cap. He predicted that the cap would force many school districts to use what little reserves they have left to salvage academic programs to the greatest extent possible.

“Even with reserve funds, I anticipate that our Board of Education will have to consider layoffs and further program reductions this year to develop a budget that meets the requirements of the cap and that can gain voter approval,” he said.

 “This legislation will create monumental change in public education for all rural high-needs districts in New York State, not just Fort Plain.”

The tax cap legislation was approved at the same time as a package of items that legislators said was intended to offer districts some “mandate relief,” referring to state laws and regulations that drive up costs — and ultimately taxes. It’s unclear which, if any of these items will offer meaningful cost savings to Fort Plain.

The tax cap law did not address many of the costs that drive up school spending, and ultimately taxes, including:

  • salaries,

  • health insurance costs,

  •  retirement contributions, and

  •  An ever-growing list of state mandated programs and services.

Legislators did approve the creation of a Mandate Relief Council to identify and repeal “unsound, unduly burdensome laws and regulations.”

To cope with a loss of state aid and the sagging economy in recent years, the district has cut virtually all expense categories over the last several years including field trips and spending for new equipment. In 2011-12, Fort Plain cut spending by $400,000 from the previous year’s budget, in part by eliminating 17 positions, including eight teachers and one administrator.

Mr. Burton said that without legislative and regulatory changes that help schools control these costs, the tax cap alone will force even more difficult choices.

“While legislators may think that schools can simply ‘cut the fat’ and become more efficient, the truth is that we have been running on a budget that is quite lean for a long time,” he said. “There is no more ‘fat’ to trim.
“Further cuts can only come at the expense of jobs and programs, meaning fewer teachers, larger class sizes and fewer programs, reduced sports offerings, fewer support staff such as custodians and food service staff.”

Tax cap basics

The tax cap law sets forth a formula that districts will use to calculate their allowable increase under the cap.

Though much-publicized, the “lesser of 2 percent or the rate of inflation” is only one factor contributing to a district’s cap, or "tax levy limit." In fact, there are eight different steps to the calculation outlined in the legislation, plus certain costs that are exempt from the limit. As such, many districts may propose tax levy increases above the 2 percent threshold and still be within their “cap.”

Exemptions include: growth in the state pension system contributions that exceeds a certain level; tax base growth; and some court judgments and successful tax assessment challenges.

These exemptions mean that school districts could propose tax levy increases above two percent (or inflation), and still be considered within the cap

So, what does it mean to be considered “within the cap?”

Voters will still decide on school budgets in New York. Whether or not a district is within the cap determines what level of voter support they need for budget approval.

If a district is within its calculated cap, then it only needs the support of a simple majority of voters for budget approval.

A district can exceed its calculated cap with the support of a supermajority (60 percent) of voters.

Similar to current law, school districts can hold up to two budget votes under the tax cap law. If two budget votes are defeated, districts would be prohibited from raising the tax levy and higher than the one from the previous year.

If a local school district budget is under the cap, the difference between the requested amount and the cap amount can be carried over to the next year. This will allow them to adjust their allowable cap for that year upward without needing a supermajority for budget approval.

It’s important for taxpayers to also note that the cap applies to the district’s tax levy, and not tax rates. Individual property tax bills may go up by a different percentage than the levy, as tax rates take into account the potential for changes in assessments.

Quick Links heading graphic
Fort Plain emblem